Dear all,
I have run a meta-analysis using METAN command on odds ration scale, and the used RET LIST to see the saved results. The output I got is as below. It does not provide the pooled estimate of the effect size, tau squared, SE of log odds ratio, ect. which usually provided by STATA 9.2 Thanks scalars: r(ymin) = 0 r(ymax) = 8 r(xmin) = .0469176173210144 r(xmax) = 1046.383911132813 r(ay) = -2339.5 r(by) = 19771 r(ax) = 2544.230488395218 r(bx) = 13254.72217268045 macros: r(dbox) : "1055,5471,19771,30945,443,213,0" r(gbox) : "0,0,22376,32000,923,444,0" This output is different to the one that I usually see in Intercooled STATA 9.2 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ |
Line for the server...
What has changed? Have you switched to Stata 10 or updated -metan- or both? Try to formulate your question in terms of the examples in -h metan-... HTH Martin -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Mendis, A.S.J. Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:12 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: st: ret list of STATA10 Dear all, I have run a meta-analysis using METAN command on odds ration scale, and the used RET LIST to see the saved results. The output I got is as below. It does not provide the pooled estimate of the effect size, tau squared, SE of log odds ratio, ect. which usually provided by STATA 9.2 Thanks scalars: r(ymin) = 0 r(ymax) = 8 r(xmin) = .0469176173210144 r(xmax) = 1046.383911132813 r(ay) = -2339.5 r(by) = 19771 r(ax) = 2544.230488395218 r(bx) = 13254.72217268045 macros: r(dbox) : "1055,5471,19771,30945,443,213,0" r(gbox) : "0,0,22376,32000,923,444,0" This output is different to the one that I usually see in Intercooled STATA 9.2 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ |
To strengthen Martin's point:
This question is at best very difficult to answer without knowing 1. Which version of -metan- you are using. Show the results of -which metan-. 2. What you typed, precisely. 3. What you mean by "usually provided by Stata 9.2". I can't see that has any meaning in itself. What you are seeing are basically what might be expected after a raphics command. I can't say which. Nick [hidden email] Martin Weiss What has changed? Have you switched to Stata 10 or updated -metan- or both? Try to formulate your question in terms of the examples in -h metan-... Mendis, A.S.J. I have run a meta-analysis using METAN command on odds ration scale, and the used RET LIST to see the saved results. The output I got is as below. It does not provide the pooled estimate of the effect size, tau squared, SE of log odds ratio, ect. which usually provided by STATA 9.2 Thanks scalars: r(ymin) = 0 r(ymax) = 8 r(xmin) = .0469176173210144 r(xmax) = 1046.383911132813 r(ay) = -2339.5 r(by) = 19771 r(ax) = 2544.230488395218 r(bx) = 13254.72217268045 macros: r(dbox) : "1055,5471,19771,30945,443,213,0" r(gbox) : "0,0,22376,32000,923,444,0" This output is different to the one that I usually see in Intercooled STATA 9.2 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ |
Line for the server... Truth be told, A.S.J. did say in the subject line that he is now conducting his estimations in Stata 10, and I overlooked that in my reply. But, as Nick has said, the question remains shrouded in mystery... HTH Martin -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:32 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: st: RE: RE: ret list of STATA10 To strengthen Martin's point: This question is at best very difficult to answer without knowing 1. Which version of -metan- you are using. Show the results of -which metan-. 2. What you typed, precisely. 3. What you mean by "usually provided by Stata 9.2". I can't see that has any meaning in itself. What you are seeing are basically what might be expected after a raphics command. I can't say which. Nick [hidden email] Martin Weiss What has changed? Have you switched to Stata 10 or updated -metan- or both? Try to formulate your question in terms of the examples in -h metan-... Mendis, A.S.J. I have run a meta-analysis using METAN command on odds ration scale, and the used RET LIST to see the saved results. The output I got is as below. It does not provide the pooled estimate of the effect size, tau squared, SE of log odds ratio, ect. which usually provided by STATA 9.2 Thanks scalars: r(ymin) = 0 r(ymax) = 8 r(xmin) = .0469176173210144 r(xmax) = 1046.383911132813 r(ay) = -2339.5 r(by) = 19771 r(ax) = 2544.230488395218 r(bx) = 13254.72217268045 macros: r(dbox) : "1055,5471,19771,30945,443,213,0" r(gbox) : "0,0,22376,32000,923,444,0" This output is different to the one that I usually see in Intercooled STATA 9.2 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |