Re: st: Inefficiency Models in Stata

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: st: Inefficiency Models in Stata

nicola.baldini2
My first reaction was: just continue using Frontier 4.1!!! It's far better than Stata!!!
For the serious reply, I quote from myself (please NOTE that things may have changed in Stata 10!): "Frontier 4.1 let you express the technical inefficiency term as a linear combination of some variables. INEXPLICABLY, Stata (just-updated, Intercooled, version 9.2) let you do this only for the cross-sectional command -frontier-, but not for the panel counterpart -xtfrontier-. In the latter command, the inefficiency term can be only a random variable with truncated-normal distribution, or a random variable with truncated-normal distribution multiplied by a specific function of time (exponential decay)"

Nicola
P.S. I'll NOT receive/read any email but the Digest.

At 02.33 20/11/2008 -0500, you wrote:

>Dear Statalist Members,
>
>I have an unbalanced panel data set at hand and want to estimate  
>agricultural production functions. In Frontier 4.1 there is the  
>possibility to specify the explanatory variabels and variables  
>explaining unit specific reasons for inefficiency separately. Does  
>some porcedure exist in Stata to obatain the parameters of an  
>inefficiency model with Stata?
>
>Every comment is appreciated.
>
>Christian Böber


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
Loading...